Michaela Petrufová Joppová, afgestudeerd master in de Ethiek, is aan de Universiteit van Prešov in Slowakije bezig met haar proefschrift over filosofisch-antropologische achtergrond van de ethiek van de sociale gevolgen ervan (promotor prof. Dr. Vasil Gluchman). Analyseert de kwestie van de mens als een morele entiteit in de context van fundamentele antropologische categorieën van een ethiek van sociale gevolgen. Daarin verwerkt ze ook de sociale ethiek en antropologie van Spinoza. [Cf., cf. en cf.] Over de laatste schreef ze intussen het volgende artikel:
Michaela
Petrufová Joppová, “Spinozian consequentialism of ethics of social
consequences." In: Ethics & Bioethics
(in Central Europe), 2018, 8 (issue 1–2), 41–50
Abstract: The present article deals with specific normative concepts of Spinoza’s
ethical system and compares them to certain aspects of the theory of ethics of
social consequences. At first, a way to approach the problem of normativity in
Spinoza is presented, concentrating on the obligatory character of rational –
or intellectual – motives. Then, theoretical evidence is presented which links
Spinoza to normative-ethical consequentialism. The basis for a consequentialist
model of Spinoza’s ethics is the concept of perfection, and on this basis it
seems possible to consider its compatibility with non-utilitarian forms of
consequentialism, such as ethics of social consequences. Conclusively, the
paper’s aim is to present the possibility of considering Spinozian consequentialism
as a non-utilitarian consequentialism, while considering ethics of social
consequences as a contemporary form of Spinozian consequentialism. [Cf. en PDF]
En passant
geeft ze ook het verschil aan tussen Spinoza en Kant.
In de
bibliografie van haar artikel heeft ze heel wat werk van haar promotor
opgenomen. Van deze Vasil Gluchman verschijnt dit jaar bij Cambridge Scholars
Publishing het door hem geredigeerde Ethics
of Social Consequences: Philosophical, Applied and Professional Challenges.
Axbstract:
“The edited volume presents new and unconventional views of many traditional
moral values, such as humanity, human dignity, moral right (of life), justice
and responsibility. The originality of the contributions contained in this book
is to analyze these values and approaches from the point of view of
non-utilitarian consequentialism and ethics of social consequences as one of
its forms. The authors of the chapters present new ways of solving many of the
contemporary ethical and moral issues, for example, in bioethics, medical
ethics, environmental ethics, teaching ethics, and cyber ethics, based on
non-utilitarian consequentialism and ethics of social consequences. They also
confront these approaches with other ethical theories and philosophical
traditions, which serve them as further incentives for the development of
non-utilitarian consequentialism and ethics of social consequences in
philosophical, applied and professional ethics.” [Cf.]
* * *
[Ik bewaar
hier even de titels van enige essay’s over Spinoza over liegen]
Matthew
Homan, Spinoza on a Supposed Right to Lie. In: History of Philosophy Quarterly 32 (July 2015): 235-252
Matthew
Homan, Rehumanizing Spinoza’s free man. In: Ursula Goldenbaum & Christopher
Kluz, (Eds.), Doing without Free Will:
Spinoza and Contemporary Moral Problems. Lexington Books, 2015 – books.google
John
Christian Laursen, “Spinoza, Strauss, and the Morality of Lying for Safety and
Peace.” In Winfried Schröder (ed.), Reading
Between the Lines - Leo Strauss and the History of Early Modern Philosophy.
De Gruyter. pp. 171-192 (2015) – PDF
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten