maandag 14 oktober 2019

Bibliografie Hegel & #Spinoza [15]


Hier volgt een opsomming van boeken, hoofdstukken en artikelen die “Hegel over Spinoza” (mede) tot onderwerp hebben. Een aantal is al in eerdere blogs aan de orde geweest; daar verwijs ik dan naar.
De volgorde is relatief toevallig – er zit geen strak systeem in – het is zoals ik het bij speuracties via Google tegenkwam. Een beetje heb ik chronologische volgorde nagestreefd, maar ook titels bij elkaar geplaatst waar dat mij passend leek. Uiteraard heb ik gespeurd in de Duitse Spinoza Bibliografie, maar ik had meerdere ingangen bij mijn speurwerk.
Eén ding is duidelijk: het onderwerp is zeer vaak aan de orde geweest.
Ik heb gekeken of ik net als bij de Hegelboeken van Charles Taylor en Frederick Beiser ook uit het Hegel-Handbuch van Walter Jaeschke tekst over Spinoza zou kunnen citeren. Spinoza komt wel vaak aan de orde, maar minder in aaneensluitende teksten. Dat heb ik dus nagelaten.

Walter Jaeschke, Hegel-Handbuch: Leben - Werk - Schule. Stuttgart etc.: Metzler, 2003. - XIV, 585 pp.

● Wilhelm Wundt, The ethics of Spinoza, Leibniz, and Hegel. In: Wayne I. Boucher (ed.), Spinoza: 18th and 19th Century Discussions. Vol. 6: 1888-1900. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999, pp. 234-240.
● Katherine E. Gilbert, Hegel's Criticisms of Spinoza. In: Philosophical Essays in Honor of James Edwin Creighton by former students in the sage school of philosophy of Cornell University. New York: Macmillan, 1917, pp. 26-41.

Anna Forbes Liddell, The Logical Relationship of the Philosophy of Hegel to the Philosophies of Spinoza and Kant. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina [diss.], 1924. [ cf. blog van 04-09-2016]
● Leon Roth, Spinoza in Recent English Thought. In: Mind 36, 142 (1927), 205-210 [Commentaar Duitse Spinoza Bibliografie: Das Interesse an Spinoza ist durch die Hinwendung englischer Denker zum Deutschen Idealismus, besonders zu Hegel, in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts bewirkt worden.]
● Kiyoshi Miki, Supinoza to Hēgeru [Spinoza and Hegel]. Kokusai Hēgeru renmei Nihonban [Internationaler Hegelbund. Japanese section] Tōkyō: Iwanami-Shoten, 1932. - 310 pp.
● G. H. van Senden, Spinoza en Hegel. In: Het kouter 1, #11 (1936), pp. 453-473 [te lezen op DBNL]
● Johan Herman Carp, Spinozistische en Hegelsche beschouwingswijze. In: Feestbundel: Aangeboden aan Dr. J.D. Bierens de Haan door Vrienden, Vereerders en Leerlingen ter gelegenheid van zijn 70sten verjaardag ,14 october 1936. Assen: Van Gorcum & Comp., 1936: 49-63.
● Ion Petrovici, Evocari de mari filosofi: Descartes, Spinoza, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Comte, Spengler. Bucuresti: Libreria 'Universal', [ca. 1937] - 164 pp. [Roemeens]

 
● J. D. Bierens de Haan, Spinoza en Hegel: Een verwantschap en een tegenstelling. In: Spinozistisch Bulletin 1 (1938), pp. 48-60
 ● C. Sypkens Kylstra, Hegel en Spinoza. In: Idee 19 (1941), 236-246

● Thomas Harting, Hegel und die spinozistische Substanz. In: Philosophisches Jahrbuch 75 (1967-1968), 416-419
● Laurence Foss, Hegel, Spinoza, and the theory of experience as closed. In: The Thomist 35, 3 (1971), pp. 435-446
● Efraim Shmueli, Hegel's interpretation of Spinoza's concept of substance. In: International Journal of the Philosophy of Religion 1 (1970), 176-191 [PDF op BookSC en nog eens op Booksc]  
● Efraim Shmueli, Some Similarities between Spinoza and Hegel on Substance. In: The Thomist 36 (1972), 645-657
Beide artikelen opgenomen in

● Efraim Shmueli, Crossroads of modern thought: Studies in Spinoza, Hegel, Marx, Husserl and Mannheim. Tel Aviv: Eked, 1984. 
M. Gysens-Gosselin, Hegel en Spinoza. Mededelingen vanwege Het Spinozahuis, #XXVII. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1971 - 11 pagina's [stelt weinig voor]
Andries Sarlemijn, Spinoza and Double Negation. In: Andries Sarlemijn, Hegel's Dialectic [Sovietica, #33], 1975, pp. 121-124.
Abstract: Hegel regards Spinoza as the most important rationalist. In confrontation with the philosopher from Amsterdam, Hegel’s methodology of self-movement and his criticism of the metaphysics of the understanding find especially lucid expression. [cf.
Springer]
● Eugenio Fernández García, Hegel ante Spinoza: un reto. In: Anales del Seminario de Metafisica 16 (1981), pp. 31-88
Hans-Christian Lucas, Spinoza in Hegels Logik. Mededelingen vanwege Het Spinozahuis, #XLV. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1982 – books.google.
Oorspr. Hans-Christian Lucas, Spinoza en la Logica de Hegel. In: Estudios sobre Hegel y Kant / [Selección de textos] Cirilo Flórez y Mariano Álvarez. - Salamanca: Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación D.L. [Universidad de Salamanca], 1982: 203-225.
● Hans-Christian Lucas, Hegel et l'édition de Spinoza par Paulus. In: Cahiers Spinoza, Numéro 4; Hiver 1982-83. Paris: Éditions Réplique, 1983: 127-138.
● Hermann Braun, Spinozismus in Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. In: Hegel-Studien 17 (1982), pp. 53-74
● Charles Taylor, Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1977), [cf. blog met citaten over Spinoza] .
Frederick Beiser, Hegel. Routledge [The Routledge Philosophers], 2005 - 364 pagina's – books.google; over Spinoza hier op books.google – PDF op BookSC - cf. blog met citaten over Spinoza].
Frederick Beiser (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy, CUP, 2008 - 444 pages. [PDF op BookSC]

Thomas Härtling, Hegel und die spinozistische Substanz: Zur Kritik einer theologischen Präokkupation. In: Philosophisches Jahrbuch 75 (1967-1968), pp. 416-419
Franco Biasutti, Lo spinozismo in Hegel: l'assoluto e l'individuale. In: Verifiche 2 (1973), 19-42 [Italiaans]
Wim N. A. Klever, Dialektiek contra Axiomatiek. Een confrontatie tussen Spinoza en Hegel onder methodologisch opzicht. [Mededelingen vanwege het Spinozahuis, #33]. Leiden: Brill, 1974 - 18 pp.
Wim N. A. Klever, Spinoza en Hegel: continuiteit en discontinuiteit. In: Handelingen van het Nederlands filosofisch genootschap 15 (1983), 2-16
● Patricia Ann Rensma, Eros and wholeness in the thought of Spinoza and Hegel. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Pennsylvania State University. Philadelphia, 1970. 140 pp.
Nathan Rotenstreich, From Substance to Subject: Studies in Hegel. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1974. - X (I), 132 pp. [Behandeling Spinoza: Hegel placed against Kant and Spinoza: 43-55]
Jacques D'Hondt, Hegel et Spinoza. In: Revue de synthèse 99 (1978), 207-219

Pierre Macherey
● Pierre Macherey, Hegel ou Spinoza. Paris: Maspero, 1979
Recensies
A. Reix, Recension de Pierre Macherey, Hegel ou Spinoza. In: Revue philosophique de la France et de l'étranger 104 (1979), 255
Robert Sasso, review of Macherey, Pierre: Hegel ou Spinoza. In: Les études philosophiques, 1981, pp. 106-108.
Dominique Lecourt, Recension de Pierre Macherey, Hegel ou Spinoza. In: Bulletin de bibliographie spinoziste 2 (1981), pp. 18-19
Pierre Garniron, review of Pierre Macherey, Hegel ou Spinoza. In: Hegel-Studien 16 (1981), pp. 276-279
Robert Hébert, Recension de Pierre Macherey, Hegel ou Spinoza.In: Dialogue 21 (maart 1982), pp. 171-173 [PDF op BookSC]
Denise Souche-Dagues, Spinoza et Hegel: Réflexions sur un livre récent. In: Les études philosophiques 1 (1983), 87-100
Stanislas Breton, Hegel ou Spinoza: Réflexion sur l'enjeu d'une alternative. In: Cahiers Spinoza: Numéro 4; Hiver 1982-83. Paris: Éditions Réplique, 1982-1983, pp. 61-87.
André Doz, Spinoza lecteur de Hegel?: A propos d'un ouvrage de P. Macherey. In: Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 89 (1984), 99-122
Fethi Tirik, Recension de Pierre Macherey, Hegel aw Spinoza. In: Revue Tunisienne de Études Philosopiques 1 (1984), 174-176
George L. Kline, Pierre Macherey's 'Hegel ou Spinoza'. In: Curley, Edwin & Moreau, Pierre-François (EDS.), Spinoza: Issues and Directions: The Proceedings of the Chicago Spinoza Conference (1986: Chicago, Ill.). Leiden: Brill [Brill's Studies in Intellectual History, #14, 1990, pp. 373-380.
Jan van Helmst, Omnis determinatio negatio est?: Hegels lezing van Spinoza polemisch getoetst door Pierre Macherey. In: Algemeen Nederlands tijdschrift voor wijsbegeerte 77 (1985), 222-234

● Pierre Macherey, Hegel or Spinoza. Transl. by Susan M. Ruddick. University of Minnesota Press, 2011 [cf. blog]
● Pierre Macherey, Hegel reads Spinoza. In: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 29, 2011 [Voorpublicatie uit bovenstaand boek; PDF op BookSC]        
● Pierre Macherey, Hegel oder Spinoza. Aus dem Französischen von Jan Philipp Weise und Julien Veh. Wien: Turia & Kant, 1 sept. 2019 [cf. blog]   
● Pierre Macherey, Le Spinoza idéaliste de Hegel. In: Pierre Macherey, Avec Spinoza. Études sur la doctrine et l'histoire du spinozisme. Paris: Pr. Univ. de France [PUF], 1992, pp. 187-197. Ook in:
● Pierre Macherey, Hegels idealistischer Spinoza [Vertaald naast Le Spinoza idéaliste de Hegel]. In: Manfred Walther (Hrsg.), Spinoza und der deutsche Idealismus. Würzburg: Königshausen u. Neumann [Schriftenreihe der Spinoza-Gesellschaft, #1, 1992, pp. 146-162 Du.(145-161 Fr.)
● Kenneth L. Schmitz, Hegel's assessment of Spinoza. In: Richard Kennington (ed.), The philosophy of Baruch Spinoza. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press [Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, #7], 1980, pp. 229-243
● Eugenio Fernández García, Hegel ante Spinoza: Un reto. In: Separata de Anales del Seminario de Metafísica 16 (1981), 31-88 [Spaans]
● Erhard Albrecht, Der Spinozismus im Urteil Hegels und unserer Zeit. In: Kurt Müller c.s. (Hrsg.), Theoria cum praxi: Zum Verhältnis von Theorie und Praxis im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert: Akten des III. Internationalen Leibnizkongresses, Hannover, 12. bis 17. November 1977 : Bd. 2: Spinoza. Wiesbaden: Steiner [Studia Leibnitiana: Supplementa, #20], 1981, pp.  123-129.
● Leo Lugarini, Fonti spinoziane della dialettica di Hegel. In: Revue internationale de Philosophie 36 (1982), pp. 21-36
● Jean-Pierre Lefèbvre, Heine, Hegel et Spinoza. In: Cahiers Spinoza 4 (1983), pp. 211-229
● Biagio De Giovanni, Spinoza e Hegel: L'oggettivismo di Antonio Labriola. In: Centauro 9 (1983), 26-47
● Errol Eustace Harris, The concept of substance in Spinoza and Hegel. In: Emilia Giancotti (cura), Spinoza nel 350° anniversario della nascita = Proceedings of the first Italian international congress on Spinoza: Atti del Congresso (Urbino 4-8 ottobre 1982). Napoli: Bibliopolis [Saggi Bibliopolis, #19], 1985, pp. 51-70.
● Walther Christoph Zimmerli, Der absolute Grundsatz (Fichte, Spinoza). In: Hegel-Studien 12 (1986), 137-155
● Oingrong Zhang, Spinoza de bianzhengfa yu Hei-ge-er de bianzhengfa de guanxi [Spinozas & Hegels Dialektik]. In: Duju xuekan 4 (1990), 27-31 [Chinees]
● Leslie Armour, Being and Idea: Developments of some themes in Spinoza and Hegel. Hildesheim [e.a.]: Olms [Philosophische Texte und Studien, #26], 1992. - XXII, 185 pp.   1994 [PDFop BookSC]                            
● Review van Vance Maxwell, Making God Go Away and Leave Us Alone: A Critical Note in Leslie Armour's Spinozist 'Being and Idea'. In : Dialogue  35, 4 (1996), 805-820 [PDF op BooSC]
● Israel Eisenstein, Constantin Brunners Philosophie in ihrem Verhältnis zu Spinoza, Kant und Hegel. Band 2 Brunner im Gespräch: Schriftenreihe des Internationaal-Constantin-Brunner-Instituut Den Haag und  der Constantin-Brunner-Stiftung Hamburg. Essen: Die blaue Eule, 1995, - 227 pp.
● V. Hösle, Hegel und Spinoza. In: Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 59ste Jaarg., Nr. 1 (maart 1997), pp. 69-88 [PDF op BookSC]
● Vittorio Hösle, Hegels System: Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftl. Buchgesellschaft / Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1998. Anhang. Hegel und Spinoza: 685-700
● Laura Mary Byrne, Hegel's Critique of Spinoza's Concept of Substance. [Toronta, Univ., Diss., 1988]. Toronto, 1988.
● Klaus Düsing, Von der Substanz zum Subjekt: Hegels spekulative Spinoza-Deutung. In: Manfred Walther (Hrsg.), Spinoza und der deutsche Idealismus. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann [Schriftenreihe der Spinoza-Gesellschaft, Artola: #1], 1992, pp. 163-180.
● Artola Barrenechea, La crítica hegeliana a la filosofía de Spinoza. In: Anales del Seminario de Metafísica 1 (1992), 635-656
● Felicitas Englisch, Protokoll der Diskussion "Hegel und Spinoza": Hegels spekulative Spinoza-Deutung. In: Manfred Walther (Hrsg.), Spinoza und der deutsche Idealismus. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann [Schriftenreihe der Spinoza-Gesellschaft, #1], 1992, pp. 181-197
● Felicitas Englisch, Zu Religion und Staat bei Spinoza und Hegel : Mit einem Ausblick auf Ökonomie. In: Felicitas Englisch, Manfred Lauermann & Maria-Brigitta Schröder (Hrsg.), Randfiguren: Spinoza-Inspirationen; Festgabe für Manfred Walther. Hannover-Laatzen: Wehrhahn, 2005, pp. 211-247.
● Yutaka Sasazawa, Hegeru to gensou no Supinoza [Hegel and his illusionary Spinoza]. In: Gendai Shiso [La revue de la pensée d'aujourd'hui] 21.8 (1993) [Japans]
● Yoshitomo Takeuchi, Hegel and Nishida on Spinoza. In: Shiso 764 (1988), 4-23 [Japans]
● María del Rosario Zurro Rodríguez, Spinoza en Hegel: La mediación de Jacobi. In: Cuadernos del Seminario Spinoza 16 (2004), 1-21
● Mariana de Gainza, Espinosa versus Hegel: Motivos de uma confrontação. In: Cadernos espinosanos XIII (2005), 9-23
● Peggy Cosmann, Der Einfluß Friedrich Christoph Oetingers auf Hegels Abrechnung mit Spinoza: Die Selbstbewegung des Absoluten versus bestimmungslose und unlebendige Substantialität. In: Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte. Sonderdruck. 50, 2 (1998), pp. 115-136 [PDF op BookSC]
● Jörg Dierken, Kontingenz bei Spinoza, Hegel und Troeltsch: ein Umformungsfaktor im Verhältnis von Gott, Welt und Mensch. In: Ingolf U. Dahlfert (Hrsg.), Vernunft, Kontingenz und Gott: Konstellationen eines offenen Problems. Tübingen: Mohr, 2000, pp. 213-232.
● Dieter Henrich, Jacobi and the 'Spinozism of Freedom'. In: Dieter Henrich, Between Kant and Hegel. Lectures on German Idealism. Edited by David S. Pacini. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press, 2003: 85-112. [books.google]
● Merold Westphal, Hegel Between Spinoza and Derrida. In: David A. Duquette (ed.), Hegel's History of Philosophy: New Interpretations. Albany: State University of New York Press [SUNY Series in Hegelian Studies], 2003, pp. 143-163.
● Jørgen Huggler, To anmærkninger om Spinoza fra G. W. Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. In: Slagmark: tidsskrift for idéhistorie [Special Spinoza; ed. Mogens Lærke; Aarhus: 2004. - 190 pp.], 39 (2004), pp. 43-57
● Simon Duffy, The logic of expression: quality, quantity and intensity in Spinoza, Hegel and Deleuze. Aldershot: Ashgate [New Critical Thinking in Philosophy], 2006. - X, 284 pp.
● T. L. S. Sprigge, The God of Metaphysics: Being a study of the metaphysics and religious doctrines of Spinoza, Hegel, Kierkegaard, T. H. Green, Bernard Bosanquet, Josiah Royce, A. N. Whitehead, Charles Hartshorne, and concluding remarks with a defence an panteistic idealism. Oxford: Clarendon, 2006. XIX + 576 pp.
● Wolfgang Bartuschat, Hegels neue Metaphysik. In: Metaphysik im deutschen Idealismus = Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 5 (2007),  pp. 211-234
● Wolfgang Bartuschat, Nur hinein, nicht heraus: Hegel über Spinoza. In: Dietmar H. Heidemann & Christian Krijnen (Hrsg.), Hegel und die Geschichte der Philosophie. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges., 2007, 101-115. Ook opgenomen in
● Wolfgang Bartuschat, Spinozas Philosophie: Über den Zusammenhang von Metaphysik und Ethik. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2017, p. 404 [cf. blog]
● José M. Sánchez Fernández, Spinoza y Hegel: un reencuentro en el absoluto: Una lectura hegeliana de Spinoza. In: Julián Carvajal & María Luisa de la Cámara (eds.), Spinoza: de la física a la historia. Cuenca: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha [Estudios, #117], 2008, pp. 501-511.
● Monserrat Galcerán Huguet, Spinoza y Hegel o la metafísica de la libertad frente a la potencia del libre pensamiento. In: Monserrat Galcerán Huguet & Mario Espinoza Pin, (eds.), Spinoza contemporáneo. Madrid: Tierradenadie Ediciones, 2008, pp. 245-266.
● Hans-Jürgen Gawoll, Hegel - Jacobi - Obereit. In Helmut Schneider (Hrsg.), Konstellationen im deutschen Idealismus; mit Texten Jakob Hermann Obereits im Anhang. Frankfurt, M./etc.: Peter Lang [Hegeliana, #21], 2008. - 150 pp.
● Brekelmans, F.H.J.G., & Bink, E.F.R., Beeld en evenbeeld_Een uiteenzetting van Hollaks begrip van Hegels filosofie en diens metafysische gevolgtrekkingen uit dat begrip. [dissertatie], 2013 [meer info in dit blog]

● Robert Stern, Hegelianism vs. Spinozism? A. W. Moore on Hegel. In: Philosophical Topics, Vol. 43, No. 1/2, The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics:Responses to A. W. Moore with His Replies (SPRING/FALL 2015), pp. 97-112
● Henry Alonzo Myers, Systematic Pluralism in Spinoza and Hegel. In: The Monist, Vol. 45, No. 2 (July, 1935), pp. 237-263
● Henry Alonzo Myers, The Spinoza-Hegel Paradox: A study of the choice between traditional idealism and systematic pluralism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1944. Pp. xii+91. Reprint New York: B. Franklin, 1974
● J. B. McMinn, A Critique on Hegel’s Criticism of Spinoza’s God. In: Kant Studien 51, 1959/1960, 294-314. [Cf. blog] [PDF op BookSC]
● Eugène J. Fleischmann, Die Wirklichkeit in Hegels Logik. Ideengechichtliche Beziehungen zu Spinoza. In: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, Bd. 18, H. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1964), pp. 3-29
● G. H. R. Parkinson, “Hegel, Pantheism, and Spinoza,” in: Journal of the History of Ideas 38:3, July-September 1977, pages 449-459. [PDF op BookSC]
● Béatrice Longuenesse, Hegel et la critique de la métaphysique: Étude sur la doctrine de l'essence. Paris: Vrin [Bibliothèque de l'histoire de la philosophie], 1981. - 217 pp. [Hegel n'est pas spinoziste: 188-204]
● Jean-Pierre Lefebvre, Heine, Hegel et Spinoza. In: Cahiers Spinoza, Numéro 4; Hiver 1982-83. Paris: Éditions Réplique, 1983, pp. 211-229.
● Shlomo Pines, spinoza's conception of human freedom and of good and evil: On Hegel's Critique of Spinoza. In: Nathan Rotenstreich & Norma Schneider (EDS.), Spinoza - His thought and work: entretiens in Jerusalem [The Israel Academy of Science and Humanities], 6 - 9 sept. 1977; [comm. the 300. anniv. of Spinoza's death]. Jerusalem, 1983: 147-159
● Vesa Oittinen, Hegel, Spinoza ja Mefisto. In: Jyväskylän yliopiston filosofian laitoksen julkaisuja 33 (1986), pp. 77-93
● Markku Hongisto & Vesa Oittinen, "Potentia hominis": Spinoza, Hegel, Marx über das menschliche Wesen. In: Hans Heinz Holz (Hrsg.), Annalen der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Dialektische Philosophie, Societas Hegeliana, Teil 3. 1986, pp. 170-17
● Carsten Schlüter, Bestimmtheit - Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Spinozakritik. In: Ders.: Adornos Kritik der apologetischen Vernunft, Bd. 2 [von 2]- Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann [Epistemata: Würzburger wissenschaftliche Schriften, Reihe Philosophie, #46], 1988, pp. 409-414. [oorspr.: Kiel, Univ., Diss., 1985]
● Paola de Cuzzani, Spinoza et les spinozismes: De Oldenbourg à Hegel; l'histoire d'une répudiation. In: Revue d'Histoire et de Philosophie Religieuses 71 (1991), pp. 349-364
● Wolfgang Röd, Der Gott der reinen Vernunft: Die Auseinandersetzung um den ontologischen Gottesbeweis von Anselm bis Hegel. München: Beck, 1992. - 239 pp.
● Vittorio Morfino, Substantia sive Organismus: Immagine e funzione teorica di Spinoza negli scritti jenesi di Hegel; prefazione di Fulvio Papi. Napoli: Guerini [Hegeliana, #17], 1997. - 175 pp.
● Vittorio Morfino, "Causa sui" o "Wechselwirkung": Engels tra Spinoza e Hegel. In: Mario Cingoli (cur.), Friedrich Engels cent'anni dopo: ipotesi per un bilancio critico; [atti del Convegno internazionale di studi Milano 16-18 novembre 1995]. Milano: Teti [Studi e documenti], 1998, pp. 120-147.
● Vittorio Morfino, "Ordo et connexio": Di Hegel traduttore di Spinoza. In: Mario Cingoli [cif.), L'esordio pubblico di Hegel: per il bicentennario della Differenzschrift; atti del Conv egno internazionale, Università di Milano-Bicocca, 26-28 novembre 2001. Milano etc.: Guerini [Hegeliana, #39], 2004, pp. 217-225.
● Martin Bondeli, Spinozanische und anti-spinozanische Denkfiguren in Hegels philosophischer Entwicklung bis 1800. In: Eva Schürmann, Norbert Waszek & Frank Weinreich (Hrsg.), Spinoza im Deutschland des 18. Jahrhunderts: Zur Erinnerung an Hans-Christian Lucas. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog [Spekulation und Erfahrung: Abt. 2, Untersuchungen, #44], 2002, pp. 503-531
● Vesa Oittinen, Hegel und Spinoza in 'Glauben und Wissen'. In: Andreas Arndt c.s. (Hrsg.), Glauben und Wissen Dritter Teil [auf dem 24. Internationalen Hegel-Kongreß 2002 in Jena gehaltene Vorträge]. Berlin: Akademie-Verl. [Hegel-Jahrbuch, 2005], 2005, pp. 132-139.
● Vittorio Morfino, Spinoza in 'Glauben und Wissen'. In: Andreas Arndt c.s. (Hrsg.), Glauben und Wissen Dritter Teil [auf dem 24. Internationalen Hegel-Kongreß 2002 in Jena gehaltene Vorträge]. Berlin: Akademie-Verl. [Hegel-Jahrbuch, 2005], 2005, pp. 140-144.
● J. M. Fritzman and Brianne Riley, Not Only Sub Specie Aeternitatis, but Equally Sub Specie Durationis: A Defense of Hegel's Criticisms of Spinoza's Philosophy. The Pluralist 4:3, Fall 2009, pages 76-97; [PDF op Academia.edu ook op BookSC]
ABSTRACT: There have been several major challenges to Hegel’s criticisms of Spinoza’s philosophy.  Thus far, no effective response has been made to those challenges.  This article defends Hegel’s criticisms of Spinoza’s philosophy, and it argues that the challenges to his criticisms fail.
De auteurs bespreken kritisch de hiervoor vermelde publicaties van Henry Alonzo Myers, J. B. McMinn en G. H. R. Parkinson.
● Yirmiyahu Yovel, Substance without Spirit: On Hegel’s Critique of Spinoza. In: Nathan Rotenstreich & Norma Schneider (eds.), Spinoza: His Thought and Work. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1983, pp. 71-84.
● Yirmiyahu Yovel, God's Transcendence and Its Schematization: Maimonides in Light of the Spinoza-Hegel Dispute. In: Shlomo Pines & Yirmiyahu Yovel (eds.), Maimonides and Philosophy: Papers presented at the Sixth Jerusalem Philosophical Encounter. Dordrecht: Nijhoff [Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, #114], 1986, pp. 269-282.
● Yimiyahu Yovel, Spinoza and Other Heretics. Vol. 1: The Marrano of Reason. Vol 2: The Adventures of Immanence. Vol 2 heeft uitgebreid hoofdstuk over Hegel.
● Yirmiyahu Yovel, The Dark Riddle: Hegel, Nietzsche, and the Jews. Cambridge: Pennsylvania State Univ. Pr, 1998, - 235 pp. [oorspr. Hebreeuws, 1996]
● Micha Brumlik, Der Kronzeuge - Hegels Maimonides zwischen Philo und Spinoza. In: Görge K. Hasselhoff cs. (eds.), Moses Maimonides (1138-1204). His religious, scientific and philosophical Wirkungsgeschichte in different cultural contexts. Ergon [Ex oriente lux, #4], 2004, pp. 385-395.
● Jukka Laari, Hegel and Nietzsche on Spinoza. In: Vesa Oittinen (ed.), Spinoza in Nordic Countries = Spinoza im Norden. Helsinki: Univ. of Helsinki / Dep. of Philosophy; Dep. of Social and Moral Philosophy [Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki, #5], 2004, pp. 217-236.
● Amihud Gilead, The problem of immediate evidence : The case of Hegel and Spinoza. In: Hegel-Studien, Vol. 20 (1985), pp. 145-162
● André Doz, La logique de Hegel et les problèmes traditionels de l'ontologie. [Poitiers, Univ., Diss., 1986]. Paris: Vrin, 1987, - 325 pp.
● Horst Folkers, Spinozarezeption bei Jacobi und ihre Nachfolge beim frühen Schelling und beim Jenenser Hegel. In: Philosophisches Jahrbuch. Sonderdruck 105, 2 (1998), 381-397
● Henryk Pisarek, Spinozas Konzeption von 'Systemhaftigkeit' im Blick auf Hegel. In: Hegel-Jahrbuch 1998, pp. 38-43.
● Andreas Graeser, Studien zu Spinoza, Herder, Hölderlin und Hegel. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verl., 1999. - 135 pp.
● Junji Kanda, Hegel oder Herder: der dynamisierte Spinozismus im Frühwerk von Moses Heß. In: Herder-Studien  5 (1999), pp. 69-85
● Jeffrey Edwards, Spinozism, Freedom, and Transcendental Dynamics in Kant’s Final System of Transcendental Idealism. In: Sally Sedgwick (ed.), The reception of Kant's critical philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel: [Conference "The Idea of a System of Transcendental Idealism in Kant, Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel" at Dartmouth College; (Hanover, NH): 1995.08.]. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000: pp. 54-77.
● Gunnar Hindrichs, Spinozismus, Antispinozismus und die Entstehung der Hegelschen Dialektik. Wroclaw: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wroclawskiego, 2001
● Angelica Nuzzo, Spinozas 'Amor Dei intellectualis' und Hegels methodologische Umdeutung des Liebesbegriffs. In: Achim Engstler & Robert Schnepf (Hrsg.), Affekte und Ethik: Spinozas Lehre im Kontext. Hildesheim: Olms [Studien und Materialien zur Geschichte der Philosophie, #62], 2002, pp. 246-262.
● Helmut Holzhey, Die Entzauberung des Pantheismus: Cohens Kritik an Hegels und Schellings Metaphysik. In: Detlev Pätzold (Hrsg.), Der Neukantianismus und das Erbe des deutschen Idealismus: die philosophische Methode. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann [Studien und Materialien zum Neukantianismus, #19], 2002, pp. 49-64.
● D. Patelis, Aspects of the Substance as a logical and methodological notion: From Spinoza to Hegel. In: Utopia 61 (2004), pp. 23-43
● Friedrich Grimmlinger, Spinoza in Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. In: Max Gottschlich und Michael Wladicke (Hrsg.), Dialektische Logik: Hegels 'Wissenschaft der Logik' und ihre realphilosophischen Wirklichkeitsweisen - Gedenkschrift für Franz Ungler. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2005: 252-266.
● Ricardo Cattaneo, La exposición del Absoluto y lo inefable: Hegel y su recepción de Spinoza. In: Spinoza: Segundo coloquio. Córdoba, Argentina, 2005 [compilado por Diego Tatián]; [organizado por el] Círculo Spinociano de la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Editorial Altamira [Pensamiento. Crítica], 2006, pp. 45-53.
● Birden Güngören, Spinoza ve Hegel'de Özgürlük Düşüncesi [The idea of freedom in Spinoza and Hegel]; Masterthesis İstanbul, Galatasaray Univ. under the supervision of Cemal Bâli Akal. İstanbul 2004. - 148 pp.
 
● Birden Güngören, Hegels Auffassung von Spinoza und der östlichen Philosophie: Eine Parallele. In: Hegel-Jahrbuch 2009. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2009, pp. 114-120.
 
● Birden Güngören, Die Bedeutung von Hegels Spinoza-Lektüre für seine Staats- und Rechtstheorie. Hannover Univ., Diss. 2011. Berlin: Logos Verl., 2011. - X + 185 pp.

Cf. blog van 10-09-2016: Birden Güngören, Turkse Spinoza scholar aan de Galatasaray Universiteit
 
● Francesca Michelini, Hegel "spinozista conseguente"? In: Giornale di Metafisica 15, 2 (2003), pp. 271-285
● Jerry W. Barmore, Theology and politics in Maimonides, Spinoza, Hegel, and Nietzsche. Dissertation. Urbana/Champaign: [Univ. of Illinois], 2004. - VI, 217 pp.
● Heidi Ravven, Hegel's Epistemic Turn - or Spinoza's? In: Idealistic Studies 33, 2-3 (2004), 195-202
● Heidi Ravven, Hegel and Spinoza on Moral Agency. APA, Pacific Division, San Francisco, April 2016 [academia.edu]
● Suzanne Brauer, Das Substanz-Akzidenz-Modell in Hegels Konzeption der Familie. In: Hegel-Studien 39/40 (2005), 41-59
● Jean-Louis Vieillard-Baron, Le dieu de Spinoza et le dieu de Hegel: la substance et l'esprit. In: Christophe Bouton (éd.), Dieu et la nature: la question du panthéisme dans l'idéalisme allemand ; [actes d'un colloque sur le thème: "Dieu et la nature. La question du Panthéisme dans l'idéalisme Allemand" en Bordeaux, 2004.01. 29-30]. Hildesheim etc.: Olms [Europaea memoria : Reihe 1, Studien, #40], 2005, 91-105.
● Mathieu Robitaille, Hegel et le spinozisme dans les années d'Iena. In: Laval Théologique et Politique 63, 1 (2007), 21-39
● Gustave Flaubert, 'Document inédit': Notes de Flaubert sur la philosophie de Hegel et Spinoza (transcription). In: Fiction et philosophie: avec des notes inédites de Flaubert sur la philosophie de Spinoza et de Hegel; textes réunis et présentés par Gisèle Séginger. Caen: Lettres Modernes Minard [La Revue des Lettres Modernes: Série Gustave Flaubert, #6], 2008, pp. 241-253.
● Atsushi Yamazaki, Le Dossier «Philosophie» de Bouvard et Pécuchet: Hegel et Spinoza [Transcription: Notes de Flaubert sur la philosophie de Spinoza et de Hegel. In: Fiction et philosophie: avec des notes inedites de Flaubert sur la philosophie de Spinoza et de Hegel; textes réunis et présentés par Gisèle Séginger. Caen: Lettres Modernes Minard [La Revue des Lettres Modernes : Série Gustave Flaubert, #6], 2008, [cf.]
● Ediz Uzun, Le corps chez Spinoza et l'expérience chez Hegel. Master-thesis (sup. Aliye Kovanlıkaya)  Galatasaray Üniversitesi. Istanbul, 2010. - 92 pp.
● Robert E. Wood, The Free Spirit: Spinoza, Hegel, Nietzsche. In: International philosophical quarterly 51, 3 (2011), pp. 377-389
● Birgit Sandkaulen, "Ewige Zeit": Die Ontologie Spinozas in der Diskussion zwischen Jacobi und Hegel. In: Giuseppe D'Anna & Vittorio Morfino (eds.), Ontologia e temporalità: Spinoza e i suoi lettori moderni. Milano: Mimesis [Spinoziana, #18], 2012, pp. 239-252.
● Slavoj Žižek, Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectic materialism. London etc.: Verso, 2012. - X + 1038 pp.
● Hasana Sharp, & Jason E. Smith (eds.), Between Hegel and Spinoza. A volume of Critical Essays. London etc.: Bloomsbury, 12-06-2012 [ books.google – PDF op BookSC en scribd ] – pdf Contents. Over dit boek bracht ik een apart blog uit met vermelding van de hoofdstukken [die hier in deze bibliografie dus iet meer opgenomen zijn].
● Takashi Kurihara, Spinoza ni okeru mugensei to Hegel ni okeru jikokankei [Infinity in Spinoza and Self relationship in Hegel]. In: Hegeltetsugaku Kenkyu 18 (2012), pp. 62-76 [Japans]
● Jure Zovko, Hegels Würdigung von Spinozas Affektenlehre. In: Violetta L. Waibel, unter Mitwirkung von Max Brinnich und Peter Gaitsch (Hrsg.), Spinoza - Affektenlehre und amor dei intellectualis: Die Rezeption Spinozas im Deutschen Idealismus, in der Frühromantik und in der Gegenwart. Hamburg: Meiner, 2012, pp. 77-88.
● Andreas Arndt, "Enthüllung der Substanz": Hegels Begriff und Spinozas dritte Erkenntnisart. In: Violetta L. Waibel, unter Mitwirkung von Max Brinnich und Peter Gaitsch (Hrsg.), Spinoza - Affektenlehre und amor dei intellectualis: Die Rezeption Spinozas im Deutschen Idealismus, in der Frühromantik und in der Gegenwart. Hamburg: Meiner, 2012, pp. 231-242.
● Vito Rizzo, Hegel y la substancia de Spinoza: Un paradójico desencuentro. In: Diego Tatián (comp.), Spinoza: Noveno coloquio. Córdoba: Brujas, 2013, pp. 413-422.
● Yitzhak Y. Melamed, Acosmism or Weak Individuals?: Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite. In: Journal of the History of Philosophy, Vol 48, 2009 [cf. PDF op academia.edu, PDF op BookSC]
● Yitzhak Melamed, "Hegel, Spinoza and McTaggart on the Reality of Time". In: Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus / International Yearbook of German Idealism 14:211-234 (2016) [PDF op academia.edu]
● Yitzhak Y. Melamed, "Omnis determinatio est negatio": Determination, negation, and self-negation in Spinoza, Kant and Hegel. In: Eckart Förster and Yitzhak Y. Melamed (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 175-196. [PDF op academia.edu]
● Dean Thoughts and metaphysics: Hegel's critical reception of Spinoza. In: Eckart Förster and Yitzhak Y. Melamed (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 197-213.
● Gunnar Hindrichs, Two models of metaphysical inferentialism : Spinoza and Hegel In: Eckart Förster and Yitzhak Y. Melamed (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 214-231.
● David S. Stern (ed.), Essays on Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. SUNY Press, 2013 [The first English-language collection devoted to Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit.] [PDF bij BookSC]
● Tom Frenzel, Aggression und Freiheit: eine Relektüre Hegels und Spinozas zu Grenzfragen der Psychologie. [Potsdam, Univ., Diss., 2014], 2013. - 270 pp.
● Ted Stolze, Hegel or Spinoza: Substance, Subject, and Critical Marxism. In: Crisis & Critique 1.3, 2014, pp. 355-69. Dit artikel bracht ik in dit blog.
● Thomas Hanke, Die falsche Alternative von Naturalismus und Theismus: Zur systematischen Tragweite von Hegels Reaktion auf Jacobis Spinoza-Briefe. In: Ana Honnacker & Matthias Ruf (Hrsg.), Gott oder Natur: Perspektiven nach Spinoza. Münster: LIT [Philosophie aktuell, #12], 2015, pp. 47-59.
●. Antonios Kalatzis, Gott oder Natur - oder Geist?: Hegel über Spinoza. In: Ana Honnacker & Matthias Ruf (Hrsg.), Gott oder Natur: Perspektiven nach Spinoza. Münster: LIT [Philosophie aktuell, #12], 2015, pp. 61-74. [PDF op Academia.edu. Cf. hierover blog van 19-10-2016: Hegels worsteling met Spinoza helder toegelicht]
● James Kreines, Spinoza, Kant and the Transition to Hegel’s Subjective Logic: Arguing For and Against Philosophical Systems. In: Hegel Bulletin, Volume  40 - Special Issue 1 [Science of Logic] -  April 2019- PDF op BookSC
● Robert B. Pippin, Hegel's Idealism. The Satisfaction of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, 1989 – [ books.google - PDF op BookSC]. Spinoza komt er nauwelijks / heel weinig in voor!
● Robert Pippin, Hegel on self-consciousness. Desire and death in The Phenomenology of Spirit. Princeton University Press, 2010 (hardcover), 2014 (paperback) - 120 pages – PDF op BookSC: Pippin's Spinoza Lectures given at the University of Amsterdam in April and May of 2009. [Spinoza komt er verder niet in voor]

 ● Robert B. Pippin, Hegel's Concept of Self-consciousness. [Spinoza Lectures] Uitgeverij Van Gorcum, 2010 - 55 pagina's. [Spinoza komt er niet in voor] – books.google -  cf. blog van 01-04-2009 

Robert B. Pippin, Hegel's Realm of Shadows: Logic as Metaphysics in the Science of Logic. The University of Chicago Press, 21 december 2018 - 352 pages
Review door Charlotte Baumann in: British Journal of the History of Philosophy, 2019. [Cf. academia.edu] De eerste alinea’s luiden aldus:
With Hegel’s Realm of Shadows the analytic, American interpretation of Hegel has come full circle. After Klaus Hartmann proposed a Kantian and non-metaphysical Hegel in 1972 (‘Hegel: A Non-Metaphysical View’, in A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. A. MacIntyre, New York: Anchor Books, 101–124), it was arguably Rorty’s historicist take on Hegel, along with his demand to ‘change the subject’ away from metaphysical questions, which paved the way for an increased interest in Hegel’s philosophy (see Rorty, Consequences of Pragmatism. Essays 1972–1980. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982, xiv). Suddenly, Hegel’s philosophy was seen to be unencumbered by metaphysics. And since his authoritarianism has historically been linked to his metaphysics, he was also considered nonauthoritarian and relevant to contemporary debates (see Baumann, ‘Was Hegel an Authoritarian Thinker. Reading his Philosophy of History on the Basis of his Metaphysics’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophy [forthcoming]). Now the very subject that Rorty wanted to avoid has come back to haunt interpreters in the tradition of Pippin, Pinkard, Brandom and McDowell. This is not only because it is hard to deny its relevance for Hegel, but also because of the resurgence of interest in metaphysics in analytic philosophy.
Hegel’s Realm of Shadows is the first book-length study of Hegel’s metaphysics among the leading exponents of this tradition. In line with Hegel, Pippin distinguishes between the ‘old’, pre-Kantian metaphysics of Spinoza and Leibniz among others and a ‘new’, (post-)Kantian metaphysics. Pippin’s readers will not be surprised that he associates Hegel broadly with the latter tradition. In contrast to what Hegel’s text may suggest, Pippin does not distinguish the types of metaphysics with regard to the realm of the world that they consider to be fundamental and which they, therefore, study. He does not assume that the old metaphysicians believe themselves capable of saying something about the underlying nature of the world (as it is independently of being thought of) and that the new metaphysics studies the necessary structure and categories of thought (and what effect they have on how a subject necessarily judges or thinks about any object). Rather, Pippin distinguishes the two types of metaphysics in terms of their approach to the question of knowledge. Old, pre-Kantian metaphysics wants to know ‘what there really is’ (36), the ‘furniture of the universe’ (137). The new metaphysics inspired by Kant concerns ‘the authority and legitimacy of our claims to know’ (190), it is a reflection on types of claims and their grounds or ‘unacknowledged presuppositions’ (50).
● Stephanie Ertz, Umgekehrte Vorzeichen: Motive des 'Theologisch-politischen Traktats" in Hegels 'Geist des Christentums'. In: Andreas Arndt, Christian Ibler & Günter Kruck (Hrsg.), Staat und Religion in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2009, pp. 83-9
● Konrad Cramer, Eine kritische Bemerkung zu Hegels Spinoza-Interpretation. In: Marco M. Olivetti (dir), Lo Spinozismo ieri e oggi. Padova: Cedam [Archivio di filosofia], 1978, pp. 259-265 
● Sánchez de Leon, José Mária & Noa Shein, The Coincidence of the Finite and the Infinite in Spinoza and Hegel. Forthcoming in Idealistic Studies, 2018 cf. PDF op academia.edu               
ABSRRACT: This paper proposes a reassessment of Hegel’s critical reading of Spinoza and of the charge of acosmism, for which this reading is known. We argue that this charge is actually the consequence of a more fundamental criticism, namely Spinoza’s presumable inability to conceive the unity of the finite and the infinite. According to Hegel, the infinite and the finite remain two poles apart in Spinoza’s metaphysics, which thus fails to be a true monism, insofar as it contains an irreducible duality. Against this reading, we argue that Spinoza’s conception of the causal co-determination of finite modes entails the acknowledgment of their essentially infinite nature. The study of this particular instance of coincidentia oppositorum enables to counter some of Hegel’s criticisms as well as to illuminate a fairly unexplored aspect of Spinoza’s substance monism. - published online on August 14, 2019
● Aaron Schuster (organizer), Hegel and Spinoza: Negativity in contemporary theory ; workshop. Live-Mitschnitt einer Veranstaltung am 03. Februar 2012 im ICI Berlin: ICI Kulturlabor Corporation, 2012
● Samuel Newlands, Hegel’s Idealist Reading of Spinoza. In: Philosophy Compass 6(2):100 - 108 · February 2011 [cf. – PDF op BookSC]
In this paper, I discuss Hegel’s influential reading of Spinoza as a kind of idealist. I begin with a brief overview of Spinoza’s doctrines of substance, mode, and attributes. I then turn to Hegel’s arguments that Spinoza is an acosmicist (someone who denies the existence of finite individuals) and that Spinoza’s attribute of thought becomes the sole fundamental attribute. Underlying both criticisms is Hegel’s charge that Spinoza cannot consistently affirm his doctrine of substance and his doctrines of attribute and mode pluralism. In conclusion, I discuss the legacy of Hegel’s idealist reading.
● Samuel Newlands, More Recent Idealist Readings of Spinoza. In: Philosophy Compass 6 (2):109-119 (2011) [cf. – PDF op BookSC]
Abstract: In this two-part series, I explore some of the most important and influential interpretations of Spinoza as an idealist. In this second part, I turn to more recent idealistic interpretations of Spinoza, including the important British idealist school (including Pollock, Martineau, Joachim, and John Caird) at the turn of the 20th century to a very recent and important kind of idealist reading found in the work of Michael Della Rocca.
● Mariusz Tabaczek, From Spinoza to Hegel – a Foundation of Contemporary Panentheism Applied to the Science/Theology Dialogue – PDF op academia.edu
Abstract: In recent years, the concept of panentheism has become one of the most influential methodological frameworks among authors contributing to the science/theology debate in the Anglo-American context. However, a deep and well-weighed study of its philosophical foundations is still lacking. Moreover, a more critical evaluation of its legitimacy within theological reflection in the context of natural science is needed. The aim of this article is twofold. First, I present an analysis of a critical shift in metaphysics and the philosophy of God: I trace the origin of modern panentheism, the trajectory from Spinoza to Hegel, from substance to subject, from ontologically independent to an evolving God. Secondly, I refer to Barbour, Peacocke and Clayton and try to reveal crucial problems that challenge their versions of panentheism, as well as the one presented by Hegel. I claim that they all fail to express properly God’s transcendence. I argue from the position of classical theism.
● Paul Franks, "Nothing comes from Nothing": Judaism, the Orient, and Kabbalah in Hegel's Reception of Spinoza. In: Michael Della Rocca (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 512-539.
● Paul Redding, An Hegelian Actualist Alternative to Naturalism. Chapter 5 in:
Paul Giladi (ed.), Responses to Naturalism. Critical Perspectives from Idealism and Pragmatism. Routledge, 2019 - 320 pagina's –books.google chapter 5
In this chapter, I defend Hegel's alternative to Spinozist naturalism, focussing on his approach to modality. Critical of Spinoza's necessitarianism, Hegel insisted on finding a place for possibility in the actual, and with this, he might be compared to some contemporary "actualists" who, affirming the reality of possibility, oppose David Lewis's commitment to other possible worlds. As the actual is all there is, alternate possibilities must be, somehow, internal to it—unrealised states or properties of the actual. Drawing on this parallel, I interpret Hegel's idealism as consequential to his actualism. If, as some argue (and as is suggested by the phrase "this-worldly"), "actual" functions as a type of indexical, must not the actualist be committed to minds and their subjective points of view in some sense that escapes our conception of nature? If so, actualism seems to presuppose a type of idealism. This position would be toxic only if the necessity of mindedness in reality were meant in a stronger sense—for example, were the mind thought of as necessary per se-i.e. as present in every possible state of the world. But this is just what Hegel opposes in Spinoza.
● David Proud, Toward The Idea of the Absolute: A Critical Assessment of Hegel’s Relationship to Spinoza. [Master-thesis? cf. acadeia.edu]
Hier nog een overzicht, opgediept uit Wayne Boucher, Spinoza In English, A Bibliography. A&C Black, 1999 – books.google.
 N.B. In een volgend blog: Aanvulling Bibliografie Hegel & #Spinoza [16]

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten