Er
is al heel wat geschreven over Marx en hoe hij zich met Spinoza bezig hield.
Ook op dit blog heb ik daar al veel aandacht aan gewijd. Deze maand verscheen
er weer eens een artikel over hoe Marx Spinoza las, te weten:
Bernardo
Bianchi, “Marx’s Reading of Spinoza: On the Alleged Influence of Spinoza on
Marx.” In: Historical Materialism,
Volume 26: Issue 4 [Online Publication Date:
17 Dec 2018 – cf.]
Abstract:
“In this article, I investigate a hypothesis concerning the supposed influence
of Spinoza on Marx’s works. Setting out from a comment made by Althusser –
‘[Spinoza] is the only direct ancestor of Marx’ – I try to demonstrate that
even though the relationship between Spinoza and Marx has limited support at a
historiographical level, a determined set of ideas of Spinoza can be connected
to some of Marx’s political objectives in the period prior to 1845. This
argument is supported through Marx’s notebooks devoted to studying Spinoza’s
Theological-Political Treatise, written in 1841, and his refutation of Spinoza
in The Holy Family. However, contrary to what could be expected, when Marx
abandoned his most pronounced idealistic phase, within which Spinoza played a
certain role, he rebelled against Spinozism at the same time. Nonetheless, it
is one thing to repudiate Spinoza’s name, and a very different thing to
repudiate Spinoza’s ideas.”
______________________
Cf.
ook “Marx y el aenigma Spinoza” door Nicolás González Varela op marxismocritico
Hoewel het niet precies bij dit onderwerp past, haal ik hier toch deze diapresentatie van Andrey
Maidansky van enige jaren terug naar binnen:
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten